Pb2B
Like a good boxer
playing many good moves to hit his opponent, a good basketball player
completing a series of excellent moves to have a score, a good article must
have some “moves” to convey its thesis clearly and attract and persuade
readers. During this quarter, we read the “How To Read Like A Writer” in the
course reading and “The pancake Menu’s Inside Scoop” in the class. There are
many similar “moves” in these two good
articles. By observing the specific “moves” in these two papers, one can
observe that the awareness of “moves” not only helps the reader understand the
writers’ intentions, but also helps readers to achieve the writers’ effective
methods to explain their arguments.
The first “move” of
both papers is to use a abbreviation to represent a long term that frequently
appear in the article. In the Pancake Menu’s Inside Scoop (Pancake), the writer
use “IHOP” to represent the International House of Pancakes and “OHOP” to
represent the Original House of Pancakes from the second appearance of the
names of the pancake shops. In How to Read Like a Writer (HRLW), the writer use
RLW to represent the term Read like a Writer. By using the abbreviations, the
writer makes the articles shorter and reduce the possibility that readers would
feel boring when they saw some long terms or names repeatedly.
The second similar
move is to introduce the background of the paper. In Pancake, the author
introduces what most people think about genre at the very beginning of the
article instead of exploring the features of the menus. In HRLW, the writer
firstly introduce his basic life-situation, including the year, where he
graduated, his job, etc, instead of explaining How To Read Like a Writer at
first. Adding a background before unrolling the body content can not only
attract readers but also make the articles more credible. After all, it is more
interesting to read a story than to read a formal and rigid argument.
Thirdly, while
reasoning the arguments, both authors conclude a thesis statement at the start
of each paragraph. This is the most excellent “move” I appreciate. In the
Pancake, while the author conclude that three menus are qualified to the genre
“menu” after exploring the features of the three menus separately, he writes “After
investigating the features of each literary piece, one can see although they
differ in some ways, these three “literary genres” are all qualified to belong
in the genre of menus.” at the beginning of the sixth paragraph. Actually, you
can almost find a thesis statement at the beginning of each paragraph in both
articles. This simple “move ” can make a paper more well-organized and readers
can understand the cores of the paper more easily.
The fourth move is
to use a question as a transition. In the Pancake, the author writes “Yes, they
are all similar, but why are they different?” at the end of the sixth
paragraph. Obviously, the author explored the similarities of three menus
before this question and will observe the differences of three menus after this
question. However, it is abrupt to turn to the differences from the
similarities. This “move” makes the structure more coherent. Similarly, in the
HRLW, the author writes “What are the advantages and disadvantages?” at the
beginning of the second paragraph (page 73). Obviously, the author explores the
advantages and disadvantages in the next several paragraphs. Using a question
as a transition is a good way to turn to a new point from a previous one. Anyway,
compared to a formal statement without any emotion, a question can arise the
interests of readers.
Last but not least, both
authors use parenthetical citations. In other words, both authors put the
source of each quote between a pair of parentheses right after the quote. This simple
“move” can increase the credibility of the papers. Anyway, sources of any information
represent “truth” to some extent.
In a summary, there
are 5 moves that both authors apply that I appreciate and will use in my papers
in the future: abbreviations, background, a thesis statement at the beginning
of each paragraph, using a question as a transition, and parenthetical
citations.